Governments Like Inflation

3

Let’s talk about Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) again. It’s no secret that I dislike them vs. gold in the Permanent Portfolio. But will they ever “default” as some say? No, they won’t. But this doesn’t mean they don’t have other serious problems.

I don’t believe the US will ever default on its debt because they control the money it is denominated in. They can simply print money to pay it all off. Not a good thing, but technically not a default. If you own $10,000 in TIPS and the Treasury hands you a $10,000 bill in the future they technically paid off the obligation. Of course the money may be worthless, but you did get paid back as stated in the agreement.

Now, what causes inflation? Inflation across an entire economy is caused by politics, not economics. It’s different than a shortage of a crop like corn that cause prices to spike in that one area. Inflation as a policy makes all prices go up together. This is a unilateral truth if you look at financial history.

Therefore, the idea of relying on the government causing the inflation to protect you from the inflation is a really bad idea. If the government really cared about protecting you from inflation they would implement monetary policies that balanced the demand for new money each year with the supply so inflation was 0% +-. But that’s not what they do. They target 3-4% inflation and often get it wrong and all sorts of things happen as a result.

Governments like inflation. They have no desire to protect their citizens from inflation or they wouldn’t use it as a monetary policy at all.

What does this mean? Simple:

Governments like inflation. They have no desire to protect their citizens from inflation or they wouldn’t use it as a monetary policy at all. 

Why buy a product like TIPS from an entity that is actively working against your interests behind the scenes?

Even the much vaunted “independence” of the Fed is an illusion. Enormous pressure can be put on the Chair of the Fed to react in certain ways. I really enjoyed this paper for instance that discussed the Nixon tapes and the pressure put on Fed Chair Arthur Burns. Nixon wanted an easy money supply for political reasons at the risk of sending inflation even higher and it appears Burns complied. The taped quotes are interesting:

How Richard Nixon Pressured Arthur Burns: Evidence from the Nixon Tapes

What’s the lesson from this (and likely other manipulations by later administrations)? Well it’s that true inflation protection is not going to be gained by trusting the people with their hands on the printing press.

TIPS may be wonderful if inflation is low and steady. But I have a very difficult time believing they are going to do any better than a simple short-term Treasury fund in terms of offering inflation protection under higher rates. In other words, they are very likely to just tread water or probably lose a little each year in the game of catch up if bad inflation comes to the US.

Don’t buy TIPS for the Permanent Portfolio. Gold is immune from a lot of political shenanigans that can affect the actual reporting of inflation and subsequent inflation adjusted payments. There’s nothing wrong with keeping 25% of your wealth in a form of money (gold bullion) that is not subject to the whims of those in power.

Breaking News! NPR Posts Article that Admits Free Markets Work!

3

I can’t believe my eyes.  NPR actually posted an article admitting free markets work.

The Secret Document that Transformed China

At one meeting with communist party officials, a farmer asked: “What about the teeth in my head? Do I own those?” Answer: No. Your teeth belong to the collective.

In theory, the government would take what the collective grew, and would also distribute food to each family.

There was no incentive to work hard — to go out to the fields early, to put in extra effort, Yen Jingchang says.

“Work hard, don’t work hard — everyone gets the same,” he says. “So people don’t want to work.”

It’s a baby step for NPR, but I’m glad they took it.

H/T to Bob for pointing this out.

Harry Browne in 1970 Discussing the Coming Devaluation of the Dollar

0

Harry Browne in September 1970 on the TV show “Firing Line” with William Buckley, Jr. He is discussing how the US government is going to break the gold standard and the kinds of repercussions it may have. The gentleman in the middle, Eliot Janeway, was proven completely wrong when Nixon did in fact end the gold standard on August 15, 1971 and touched off a decade of very bad inflation.

Hat tip to MediumTex on the forum for this video.

 

Timing Matters, but Emotions Matter More

0

Market timing is something I’ve found many investors get drawn to eventually in their search for performance. My opinion is that market timing simply doesn’t work for a host of reasons. However it’s common to hear that if an investor just timed these various assets correctly they could have made X amount more. Yes, that’s true. But my take is simple: Timing matters but market timing doesn’t fix it.

Timing matters but market timing doesn’t fix it.

The issue is not that in hindsight that some mix of correctly timed buys would produce superior results. I don’t dispute that. But what I do dispute is that these things can be known ahead of time.

It is interesting because running this blog and forum I get people writing me all the time about timing the assets. Asset X is too much, Asset Y is a better buy, I’m going to wait on Asset Z. Etc.

I just tell them to buy all at once and be done with it. And that has proven to be the best advice over and over again. Not just because they will worry less about their money, but they will take their emotions out of the decision going forward.

It’s one thing to say an investor found some kind of timing mechanism that works on historic data. But it’s another thing entirely for them to actually follow it. What I’ve seen over and over again is that even if I thought their strategy were sound (which is practically never), they just don’t have the follow-through. More specifically, their timing system probably doesn’t work anyway and they’re using it as a way just to confirm their own biases and feelings for or against some asset class.

I had people writing me back in 2008 saying they didn’t want bonds because they were too expensive. By end of 2008 they went up +30%! So they got way more expensive.

Then in end of 2008 I told people to rebalance into stocks because they were decade low prices. But someone would write and point out all these technical analysis graphs showing, conclusively, that the Dow was going to 3,000 or whatever so they weren’t going to buy.

By end of 2009 stocks posted almost +30% gains.

Then in 2010 someone would write and not want to buy LT bonds. They said they got killed in 2009 with -20% losses and that 2010 would be just as bad because “interest rates have nowhere to go but up.”

Well they were wrong. Bonds were +9% for the year.

Then in 2011 someone would say that bonds, again, were going to lose money and they wanted to sit in ST cash because some guru had gone short on their maturity.

In 2011 LT bonds posted +30% gains.

But you know if someone had just bought all the assets and done nothing they’d have pulled in very good gains over these years with no hassle or stress. It’s easy money.

I understand the desire to time the markets. But aside from the technical aspect of knowing if the strategy will even work (it won’t), the bigger problem on top of it is that humans just aren’t good at controlling their emotions. They seek out data to confirm their biases. I have found repeatedly that this behavior not only makes them lose more money than someone that just bought in, but probably keeps them exposed to other market risks.

Here is a clip of Harry Browne discussing the same exact problem. De Ja Vu all over again:

Harry Browne on Timing Assets: Don’t do it!

Market timing doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for technical reasons and it doesn’t work for emotional reasons. Just buy the assets all at once and keep them rebalanced and you’ll be fine.

 

Reminder: Be sure to stay up to date on the upcoming Permanent Portfolio Book by signing up for the announcement list.

Aquamira Water Purification Chemical Review

2

Aquamira is a very lightweight water purification chemical. It comes in two parts, mixes easily, and produces water with no bad tastes. This is a good solution for hikers looking to save a lot of weight over a filter. Also, for those that don’t want to deal with a clogging filter, broken parts, busted seals, etc. that many pumps may have.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), chlorine dioxide (the chemical of Aquamira) is one of the best chemical treatments for a wide number of pathogens. A chart detailing the various methods is here:

CDC Backcountry Water Treatment Options

Aquamira is a simple, light and reliable way to get clean water. Highly recommended!

If you want to use a filter, then I highly recommend the Platypus GravityWorks system. It is a great solution as well:

Platypus GravityWorks Review

If this review was helpful to you, please consider making your purchase through my Amazon store. It costs you nothing extra but helps support my work. Thanks!

Crawling Road Amazon Store

 

  • Term life insurance is a cost-effective solution for your coverage needs for a set period. Learn more term life insurance

  • Whole life insurance is the simplest form of permanent life insurance for lifelong protection. Learn more whole life insurance

  • Life insurance quotes from MetLife show you just how affordable life insurance can be. Learn More life insurance quotes

Go to Top