<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soothsayers&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/</link>
	<description>Investing, economics, finance and random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigr</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>craigr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-472</guid>
		<description>Clive,

We don&#039;t know which way interest rates are going to go. Yes it is safer to hold the shorter treasuries though if you think interest rates will rise. HB recommended using only a Treasury MMF for cash for this and other reasons. I also advocate using Treasury MMF for your cash, but *optionally* if you want to take a little more risk for money you won&#039;t need for a year or so then you could do ST Treasury bonds. 

Also if you find rates go up and you are down slightly in your ST bond fund, you can simply hold onto it for the average duration and the price will eventually recover. This is why I say you should have enough in your Treasury MMF to ride out long enough in case you need to wait for the ST bonds to recover. 

In the 1970s it was the case that the ST bond fund did better than a Treasury MMF even though interest rates were rapidly rising (ST Bonds 9.4% CAGR vs. 7.7% CAGR from 1972-1982). So there is no guarantee that ST bonds won&#039;t outperform even in rising interest rates either. The markets are just not predictable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive,</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t know which way interest rates are going to go. Yes it is safer to hold the shorter treasuries though if you think interest rates will rise. HB recommended using only a Treasury MMF for cash for this and other reasons. I also advocate using Treasury MMF for your cash, but *optionally* if you want to take a little more risk for money you won&#8217;t need for a year or so then you could do ST Treasury bonds. </p>
<p>Also if you find rates go up and you are down slightly in your ST bond fund, you can simply hold onto it for the average duration and the price will eventually recover. This is why I say you should have enough in your Treasury MMF to ride out long enough in case you need to wait for the ST bonds to recover. </p>
<p>In the 1970s it was the case that the ST bond fund did better than a Treasury MMF even though interest rates were rapidly rising (ST Bonds 9.4% CAGR vs. 7.7% CAGR from 1972-1982). So there is no guarantee that ST bonds won&#8217;t outperform even in rising interest rates either. The markets are just not predictable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Craig- I think Clive has a good question...&quot;Wouldn’t it be appropriate to be holding SHY over periods of declining interest rates and BIL during periods of rising interest rates. With interest rates at near zero and only one way to go perhaps a rebalance of the ‘cash’ component out of SHY and into BIL might be considered an appropriate action.&quot;  Kindly advise your opinion on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig- I think Clive has a good question&#8230;&#8221;Wouldn’t it be appropriate to be holding SHY over periods of declining interest rates and BIL during periods of rising interest rates. With interest rates at near zero and only one way to go perhaps a rebalance of the ‘cash’ component out of SHY and into BIL might be considered an appropriate action.&#8221;  Kindly advise your opinion on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Craig.  Wouldn&#039;t it be appropriate to be holding SHY over periods of declining interest rates and BIL during periods of rising interest rates.  With interest rates at near zero and only one way to go perhaps a rebalance of the &#039;cash&#039; component out of SHY and into BIL might be considered an appropriate action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig.  Wouldn&#8217;t it be appropriate to be holding SHY over periods of declining interest rates and BIL during periods of rising interest rates.  With interest rates at near zero and only one way to go perhaps a rebalance of the &#8216;cash&#8217; component out of SHY and into BIL might be considered an appropriate action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigr</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>craigr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-469</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

I use a mix of Treasury MMF and ST Treasuries like iShares SHY. For the portfolio there is only a slight difference between the two. Harry Browne recommended only using the Treasury MMF. However if you have enough cash for near-term needs and can go a year without needing to touch it then you may want to consider using a mix of ST bonds along with it as it doesn&#039;t affect over portfolio risk that much but you get a higher return. 

The returns used are total returns which include interest, dividends and price appreciation of all the assets. My spreadsheet shows about 1.97% total return for T-Bills in 2008 and 6.68% total return for ST Treasuries. 

Keep in mind that 2008 was a very unusual year for treasury bonds. They were able to go up greatly in price as people bid them up. Bond price movements are reflected in the duration of the bond. A ST bond for instance may have a duration of 1.5 years. That means for every 1% drop in yield they go up in price by 1.5%. For every 1% rise in  yield they go down 1.5%. In 2008 I don&#039;t recall where they started, but if the yield dropped from say 3% to below 1% that would be enough to bring the price up 3-4% alone plus the interest payments. So it&#039;s quite possible to see that a return of 6.68% for ST bonds. 

Here&#039;s the short version of my Cash FAQ. It&#039;s quite simple:

1) Only own Treasury Bills in a T-Bill Money Market fund. Don&#039;t own lesser quality bonds even if the yield is higher. The ETFS such as SHV or BIL can work, but mind your transaction costs. It may be more economical to own the Vanguard Treasury Money Market Fund (even though it&#039;s not pure Treasuries, it may be close enough for this purpose and not kill you in commissions). 

2) OPTIONAL: If you have a nice savings for emergency living expenses in your Treasury MMF, then you may consider adding some ST Treasury Notes to your holdings. A fund in the 1-3 Year maturity range that ONLY holds Treasuries is a good option. Something like iShares SHY would work. 

3) Don&#039;t take risks with your cash portion. Again you should only be buying US Treasury securities for your cash. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>I use a mix of Treasury MMF and ST Treasuries like iShares SHY. For the portfolio there is only a slight difference between the two. Harry Browne recommended only using the Treasury MMF. However if you have enough cash for near-term needs and can go a year without needing to touch it then you may want to consider using a mix of ST bonds along with it as it doesn&#8217;t affect over portfolio risk that much but you get a higher return. </p>
<p>The returns used are total returns which include interest, dividends and price appreciation of all the assets. My spreadsheet shows about 1.97% total return for T-Bills in 2008 and 6.68% total return for ST Treasuries. </p>
<p>Keep in mind that 2008 was a very unusual year for treasury bonds. They were able to go up greatly in price as people bid them up. Bond price movements are reflected in the duration of the bond. A ST bond for instance may have a duration of 1.5 years. That means for every 1% drop in yield they go up in price by 1.5%. For every 1% rise in  yield they go down 1.5%. In 2008 I don&#8217;t recall where they started, but if the yield dropped from say 3% to below 1% that would be enough to bring the price up 3-4% alone plus the interest payments. So it&#8217;s quite possible to see that a return of 6.68% for ST bonds. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the short version of my Cash FAQ. It&#8217;s quite simple:</p>
<p>1) Only own Treasury Bills in a T-Bill Money Market fund. Don&#8217;t own lesser quality bonds even if the yield is higher. The ETFS such as SHV or BIL can work, but mind your transaction costs. It may be more economical to own the Vanguard Treasury Money Market Fund (even though it&#8217;s not pure Treasuries, it may be close enough for this purpose and not kill you in commissions). </p>
<p>2) OPTIONAL: If you have a nice savings for emergency living expenses in your Treasury MMF, then you may consider adding some ST Treasury Notes to your holdings. A fund in the 1-3 Year maturity range that ONLY holds Treasuries is a good option. Something like iShares SHY would work. </p>
<p>3) Don&#8217;t take risks with your cash portion. Again you should only be buying US Treasury securities for your cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Stephen- I believe Craig is using 1-3yr short term treasuries such as SHY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen- I believe Craig is using 1-3yr short term treasuries such as SHY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  How does yield come into it?  That portion of the portfolio is supposed to be cash, correct?  I&#039;ve looked at short term treasury stuff like BIL etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  How does yield come into it?  That portion of the portfolio is supposed to be cash, correct?  I&#8217;ve looked at short term treasury stuff like BIL etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigr</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/07/soothsayers/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>craigr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1901#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

Working in spurts. Been busying with non-investing stuff lately. I need to look at the data again, but the reason you see a return that high for the year is a combination of yield plus capital appreciation for holders of existing bonds. There was a flight to quality bonds which drove down yield but boosted prices for existing bonds. This means you could achieve returns higher than stated yield if you used this opportunity to rebalance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>Working in spurts. Been busying with non-investing stuff lately. I need to look at the data again, but the reason you see a return that high for the year is a combination of yield plus capital appreciation for holders of existing bonds. There was a flight to quality bonds which drove down yield but boosted prices for existing bonds. This means you could achieve returns higher than stated yield if you used this opportunity to rebalance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
