Standard & Poor’s SPIVA Report – Passive beats active…as usual.
Just going over some data on actively managed vs. passively managed funds and wanted to post the Standard & Poor’s Indices Versus Active (SPIVA) report link:
S&P is the creator of the S&P 500 index plus a variety of other domestic and international stock and bond indices. They put out their report card each year to see how industry wide performance matches up to simple index tracking funds. As you may know if you follow the passive investing style of the Permanent Portfolio, actively managed funds do poorly. Here are some highlights:
Over the past three years, which can be characterized by volatile market conditions, 63.96% of actively managed large-cap funds were outperformed by the S&P 500, 75.07% of mid-cap funds were outperformed by the S&P MidCap 400 and 63.08% of the small-cap funds were outperformed by the S&P SmallCap 600. – SPIVA Report 2011
Over five years ending June 2008, S&P 500 outperformed 68.6% of actively managed large cap funds, S&P MidCap 400 outperformed 75.9% of mid cap funds and S&P SmallCap 600 outperformed 77.8% of small cap funds. – SPIVA Report 2008
Pretty much as expected. Actively managed funds will underperform once management costs are subtracted. With average annual expense ratios on funds around 1.3%, it means that the average fund is likely to underperform the index average by at least 1.3% a year. Index funds have the advantage because their management fees are so low. An index fund by comparison may charge only 0.20% (or even less than 0.10%) a year leaving the rest of the market returns for the investor and not the managers.
It doesn’t look good for international funds, either:
Among global equity funds, five-year results show S&P Global 1200 outperforming 70.1% of global equity funds, S&P 700 outperforming 86.5% of international equity funds, and S&P IFCI Composite outperforming 73.9% of emerging market funds. – 2008 SPIVA Report
Also Wall Street continues the tradition of merging or liquidating poor performing funds at a very high rate. Over the years the disappearance of badly performing funds from the books helps to boost the remaining funds’ performance figures:
Funds disappear at a meaningful rate. Over five years, 26.8% of U.S. equity funds, 22.5% of global equity funds and 24.7% of fixed income funds have been merged or liquidated. – 2008 SPIVA Report
The SPIVA reports only go back five years at a time, but going back further means the results just get worse for actively managed funds and better for the low cost index funds. The above is why the Permanent Portfolio only uses index funds for the stock allocation and does not try to beat the market with timing strategies, etc. Over the long run, just trying to capture the market returns is the best way to beat virtually all active money managers.
Risk and the Future
Let’s talk about risk and the future.
Sometimes I get a question about event X or event Y or event Z. These can sometimes be extreme events that someone is worried over. They often want to know how the Permanent Portfolio will deal with one or all of them.
My answer is that nobody knows what every possible hypothetical event will lead to in terms of unintended consequences. Even a portfolio you think will do best under event X may in fact do quite poorly if you guess incorrectly how the markets will react. Many investors in fact have been burned in just this very way. In other words, you can be right about a bad event happening, but totally wrong on how to invest to protect yourself from it. I never assume I know how the markets will react to a piece of news myself. I’ve been surprised often enough to know it just isn’t very profitable.
However what I most appreciate about the Permanent Portfolio is the fact that it is a way to diversify against a wide variety of serious or not-so-serious economic risks without having to guess about anything. As an entrepreneur, I like having options at all times to deal with the uncertain and the Permanent Portfolio does that. I don’t however spend a lot of time considering every possible scenario that could play out because it likely won’t happen that way. At least that’s what I’ve found in the business world and life in general. I think the best strategy continues to be one in which it makes no assumptions about any particular future, but at the same time gives an investor access to assets to accommodate even extreme situations if they show up.
For instance, let’s say the stock market dives by 50% tomorrow. If your portfolio was very heavy into stocks this would be a disaster. But if your portfolio is more Permanent Portfolio style the damage is limited. The 25% division of the four major assets of stocks, bonds, cash and gold limit your downside overall. Further, you would also have access to options to deal with the disaster (such as rebalancing into stocks with your cash, bonds and gold which is very likely the best option).
The Permanent Portfolio gives you options to deal with various contingencies if they should happen.
Or let’s say that happy days are here again and gold drops by 50%. That will be bad news for gold, but probably pretty good news for stocks. Take those profits and buy the yellow metal that everyone now hates because eventually they’ll want it again. Portfolio damage is limited because the downside of the gold can be absorbed by the upside in the stocks.
On the opposite end, if Treasury bonds tank and yields rise to 10% tomorrow the gold allocation will be there to deal with the very high inflation. This will allow a rebalancing into what is likely going to be lucrative high yields on your bonds once inflation comes back down. The gold gives you that option that a concentrated portfolio alone might not.
Finally, if you find out in 10 years that the US has gone to pot and a very dangerous government is rising to power you can make a decision to keep the gold separate and not rebalance. Instead you can hold the asset for the perceived emergency. There is nothing set in stone that says you must rebalance out of gold if you thought there was a extremely serious danger and you thought you’d need it. The future is unpredictable and because you hold the gold at least you have an option that other investors may not.
Each situation needs to be addressed when it comes about. However, the Permanent Portfolio gives you options to deal with various contingencies if they should happen.
I’ve never found that dwelling on doomsday scenarios to be very useful because the future rarely ever works out the way we think. Usually it is new and surprising outcomes that nobody expected that are the problem. Instead when you think about risk and the future, think of how useful a flexible portfolio with a wide range of assets is to deal with it. When I look at the problem that way, I’m glad I run the Permanent Portfolio and don’t concentrate my bets. I like having options and the Permanent Portfolio gives them to me.
Cheap ETF Trades at TDAmeritrade for the Permanent Portfolio
TDAmeritrade has 100 commission free ETF trades going on now.
https://www.tdameritrade.com/trade/etftrading.html
They allow commission free trades on:
https://www.tdameritrade.com/trade/etflist.html
Stocks – iShares Russell 3000 (Ticker: IWV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market (Ticker: VTI) stock index funds
Bonds – iShares long-term Treasury (Ticker: TLT)
Cash – iShares 1-3 year short-term Treasury (Ticker: SHY)
Nothing on gold, but if you store it physically this doesn’t matter.
This is a great opportunity for a Permanent Portfolio investor looking to run a mostly ETF portfolio very cheaply.
Using the ETFs with physical gold storage at your local bank would give you a very solid portfolio for low cost. If you wanted to use an ETF as part of a hybrid gold allocation (some physical and some in an ETF like Tickers: GLD, IAU or SGOL) then the fees are still low because TD’s ETF commissions are very cheap.
Term life insurance is a cost-effective solution for your coverage needs for a set period. Learn more

Whole life insurance is the simplest form of permanent life insurance for lifelong protection. Learn more

Life insurance quotes from MetLife show you just how affordable life insurance can be. Learn More






