Posts tagged diversification
Callan Periodic Table of Investing Returns 2011
0I love the Callan Periodic Table of Investing Returns. This chart shows major asset classes and how they’ve done from 1992-2011. It shows very vividly the unpredictable nature of the markets and why holding a diversified investing portfolio is a good idea. It doesn’t show gold and long-term bonds that the Permanent Portfolio also uses, but the general idea still comes across.
Callan Periodic Table of Investing Returns
Thanks to the people at Callan for putting this together.
The Misleading Stocks for the Long Run Chart

I see this chart posted from Jermy Siegel’s book Stocks for the Long Run from time to time to defend why owning lots of stocks is the way to go and why owning gold is some kind of chump move.
Well I think this chart is misleading for several reasons. Gold is useful in a diversified portfolio along with stocks and bonds. It should not be 100% of a portfolio just as stocks shouldn’t be nor bonds.
First let’s explain a few things about this gold line you see here. We must understand that for the first 130 or so years of the founding of the United States gold and the dollar were the same thing (aka. the Gold Standard). With that, let’s look at this chart with this gold standard in mind:
1) From 1802-1913 the value of the dollar was strongly linked to gold and there was slight deflation over this time. There was essentially no inflation except for the period around the Civil War when Lincoln printed a lot of money to pay for things. That’s the blip you see in the early 1860s. Gold went “up” simply because the dollar was going “down.”
2) In 1933 FDR broke the gold standard. He raised the price from $20.67 an ounce to $35 an ounce to deliberately try to cause inflation. This was done after prohibiting Americans from owning gold. That’s the rise in gold price you see in that year and also when the dollar started to rapidly decline in value. A gold convertible currency prior to that keeps paper currency honest because if people think the government is printing too much money they could turn in their paper dollars for gold specie and drain the Treasury. After 1933 that was no longer possible. This was a stupid idea that achieved nothing but allow the inflation genie out of the bottle and send the dollar on a downward trajectory from that day forward.
3) In 1971, after nearly four decades of artificially low gold prices due to government price controls, Nixon broke the last of the gold standard for foreign holders of dollars. Dollars could now be converted to gold by nobody. You see the gold price spike the first couple years as it adjusted for the prior price controls. After that, I believe it was simply responding to the very high inflation. The dollar also this year begins a very big decline. By the end of the 1970s the dollar bought about only 50% of what it did in the early 1970s. By today it’s lost something around 80% of its purchasing power.
4) Gold is not volatile. It’s a piece of metal. It is only volatile against the currencies it is priced in which are the real culprits. Price spikes in gold are more of a reflection in the value of the dollar than anything. Gold is a form of money and people buy it when they think the dollar is going to have problems keeping its value.
Now back to the chart in general. This chart is misleading for several reasons:
1) The data going back to 1802 is suspect to me. Nobody could have invested that way if they wanted to even if the data is accurate (which is another debate). This chart is what stock bugs use to justify why you only need to own stocks. It’s as bad as when a gold bug shows you a chart of gold vs. the dollar and insists you only need to own gold. No, you need to own a variety of assets like the Permanent Portfolio. Concentrating your bets in any one asset is a bad idea.
2) Nobody lives for 200 years. An investor’s timeline is like 30-40 years before they need the money. Stocks have had extended periods of bad performance in the past and this makes total returns very time dependent on the individual level.
3) Gold doesn’t have interest and dividends. This is a statement of the obvious. But it has much different risks than stocks and bonds and that means it is still useful in a portfolio. The same economic factors that are horrible for stocks and bonds can be quite good for gold and vice versa. That simply means you own gold as part of a diversified portfolio and not 100%.
4) This chart also shows that over 200 years gold has had a remarkably good record of stability in terms of preserving purchasing power. This is quite remarkable when you consider the history of the US, the wars, the booms, the busts, etc. that have happened. How many companies from 1802 are still around today?
5) Gold in a diversified portfolio can increase returns, decrease volatility, decrease risk, and provide protection under serious currency problems. All good things in my book.
This chart doesn’t make the case that gold shouldn’t be owned to me. It basically makes the case that owning a lot of different assets with different risk profiles is a really good idea. Stocks can be very powerful when the economy favors them, but when it doesn’t they can languish with big losses or zero real returns for protracted periods. A portfolio with stocks, bonds, cash and gold however can weather just about anything the economy is throwing at it. Diversification is your friend.
Diversify Where You Put Your Money
MF Global lays out the perfect case for Rule #10 in the 16 Golden Rules of Financial Safety:
Are customer accounts at brokerage firms safe?
Until the collapse of MF Global, that’s a question I thought I’d never have to ask.
Brokerage firms are required by law to maintain segregated accounts holding all client assets, including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, money market funds and cash. The law was passed after the 1929 crash, in the depths of the Depression, to make sure that customer assets were there at all times, ready to be disbursed even if everyone asked for their money at once.
This obligation to protect customer assets “is considered sacrosanct,” Robert Cook, director of the division of trading and markets at the Securities and Exchange Commission, told me this week. “It’s considered a sacred obligation.”
Lehman Brothers may have engaged in many foolhardy practices, but even in the firm’s last days, when officials were desperate for cash, no one dared touch customer assets, which remained safely segregated despite the firm’s collapse.
And then came the revelation that an estimated $1.2 billion in customer assets had vanished at MF Global, the large brokerage and futures trading firm headed by Jon S. Corzine, the former Goldman Sachs executive and Democratic politician, that collapsed in late October after a catastrophic bet on European sovereign debt.
How could such a thing happen? I had always assumed it was impossible and that strict internal controls existed at all brokerage firms so that firm officials couldn’t tap segregated customer funds even if they were willing to break the law. Thanks to MF Global, it’s now apparent that isn’t necessarily true. “If people are determined to misuse customer funds, they will misuse them,” said Ananda Radhakrishnan, the director of the division of clearing and risk at the Commodities Futures Trading Commission. – A Risk Once Unthinkable by James B. Stewart – New York Times December 9, 2011
(Emphasis added)
Rule #10 States:
Rule #10: Don’t depend on any one investment, institution, or person for your safety.
Every investment has its time in the sun — and its moment of shame. Precious metals ruled the roost in the 1970s while stocks and bonds were in disgrace. But then gold and silver became the losers of the 1980s and 1990s, while stocks and bonds multiplied their value. No one investment is good for all times. Even Treasury bills can lose real value during times of inflation.
And you can’t rely on any single institution to protect your wealth for you. Old-line banks have failed and pension funds have folded. The company you think will keep your wealth safe might not be there when you’re ready to withdraw your life savings.
We live in an uncertain world, and surprises are the norm. You shouldn’t risk the chance that a single surprise will wipe out a large part of your holdings.
(Emphasis added)
I always recommend keeping your savings at more than one institution and not using the same fund company for all your investment money (for instance not using all Vanguard funds or all iShares or all Fidelity, etc.). It’s best to split up the assets in case something very bad were to happen with your brokerage or the company running the funds.
I know it’s more convenient to keep everything at one broker or fund provider because of unified statements, etc, but it’s really not a good idea for diversification. You’ll even notice on this blog when I recommend using ETFs, I tend to not provide tickers from all the same company (like iShares). Rather I think it a better idea to use some Vanguard, iShares, SPDRs and of course physical gold storage somewhere secure. MF Global is the poster-child why this kind of thinking is a good idea.
H/T to Ad Orientem for his link on the forum reminding me to make a comment about this latest financial industry debacle.
Keep the Dogma on a Leash
Sometimes I get a question about implementing the Permanent Portfolio using tools that might not fit the exact strategy laid out by Harry Browne. For instance, someone will want to know if they can use an FDIC insured account vs. a Treasury Money Market account for their cash. Or if a gold ETF is OK if they can’t hold gold physically or store it overseas.
My answer is: Do it. The basic diversification using these products is much better than doing nothing in almost every case.
I’m a huge advocate of following the strategy as closely as possible. But we should also recognize that the dogma behind the Permanent Portfolio shouldn’t interfere with the implementation if you have limited options. Delaying the diversification because we want a perfect option may leave us seriously exposed to market risks in other ways.
For instance, someone looking to do the portfolio but decides they don’t have a good cash option may decide to keep it in some risky money market sweep fund at their brokerage. This is making a mistake. They should probably put the money in a bank CD under FDIC limits if they don’t have a Treasury money market fund to put it into. Why? Because this is a better option than what they are currently doing. It’s all about making better choices on how to invest, and a FDIC account is better than an uninsured money market fund run by your broker.
Likewise for Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) for gold and long term treasuries (GLD and TLT). If your option is to not implement the full portfolio or do it only with ETFs, then buy the ETFs! You are better off with GLD and TLT ETFS for your gold and bonds than no gold and bonds whatsoever.
The take-away is that you do the best you can with the tools you have. When better and safer options make themselves available to you, then use them. But don’t delay implementing the portfolio because you can’t achieve perfection. You can still get a lot of protection from the Permanent Portfolio even if you implement it in the most basic way with imperfect options.
A ship in the storm…
The markets are very volatile. I will remind readers that your portfolio is a package made up of very volatile assets. But put together they make a smoother ride. The individual assets may move in strong directions, but the overall portfolio value is all that matters in the end.
Don’t focus on the waves causing the bobbing of the ship in the storm. Instead, focus on the direction the ship is heading.
The direction of the portfolio is still looking good so don’t worry about it and mind your rebalancing bands.





