<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Crawling Road &#187; fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crawlingroad.com/blog/tag/fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog</link>
	<description>Investing, economics, finance and random thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rule #8 Strikes Again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/11/rule-8-strikes-again/</link>
		<comments>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/11/rule-8-strikes-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craigr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=1939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A financial advisor rips of his clients. Lesson: Don't use financial advisors. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>A sad <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/11/your-money/financial-planners/11money.html?ref=business" target="_blank">article from the New York Times</a> about a financial advisor who ripped off their clients:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;<a title="PDF of S.E.C. complaint" href="http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2009/comp21078.pdf">the S.E.C. complaint</a> paints a picture of a man set on aiming at the vulnerable. The complaint lists a roster of victims, including an elderly couple with compromised mental capabilities; a 24-year-old law student who had inherited $1 million from her parents; and Mr. Weitzman’s own father-in-law, who may be out $3 million.</p>
<p>Patricia Flinn, a Brewster, N.Y., resident and a former client of Mr. Weitzman’s, met him when her husband was told, six months after they had married, that he had cancer. “He told Matt that he wanted to be sure that his wife would be taken care of.”</p>
<p>As her husband, William Adcock, lay dying, however, Mr. Weitzman helped himself to Mr. Adcock’s money, including one withdrawal on the day that Mr. Weitzman served as a witness when Mr. Adcock changed his will, Ms. Flinn said. After he died, Mr. Weitzman began taking Ms. Flinn’s money instead, she recalled. According to the government charges, he usually used forms with forged signatures to wire money from client accounts at <a title="More articles about Charles R. Schwab" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/charles_r_schwab/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Charles Schwab</a> to an account that he controlled.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yet another reminder to pay attention to the <a href="http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2008/12/17/the-permanent-portfolio-and-the-16-golden-rules-of-financial-safety/" target="_blank">16 Golden Rules of Financial Safety</a>. Especially Rule #8:</p>
<blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal" align="center"><strong><span><span>Make Your Own Decisions</span></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span>Rule #8: <span>Don’t let anyone make your decisions</span>.</span></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Many people lost their fortunes because they gave someone (a financial advisor or attorney) the authority to make their decisions and handle their money. The advisor may have taken too many chances, been dishonest, or simply incompetent. But, most of all, no advisor can be expected to treat your money with the same respect you do.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>You don’t need a money manager. Investing is complicated and difficult to understand only if you’re trying to beat the market. You can preserve what you have with only a minimum understanding of investing. You can set up a worry-proof portfolio for yourself in one day — and then you need only one day a year to monitor it. Allowing the smartest person in the world to make your decisions for you isn’t nearly as safe as setting up a safe portfolio for yourself.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Above all, never give anyone signature authority over money that’s precious to you. If you should put money into an account for someone else to manage, it must be money you can afford to lose.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you or a family member absolutely <strong>needs</strong> to use a financial advisor to run an account (say the person is not capable of making good decisions, etc.), I&#8217;d stick to <a href="http://www.vanguard.com/" target="_blank">Vanguard</a> and use their financial planners. They are backed by a large and well run company, have insurance and controls to prevent fraud, plus they won&#8217;t do anything grossly negligent with your money as they tend to be conservative (and you can direct how the money is to be invested).</p>
<p>Or if you don&#8217;t want to use a financial planner, but don&#8217;t want to run a portfolio yourself, you could put the money into the <a href="http://www.permanentportfoliofunds.com/" target="_blank">Permanent Portfolio Fund </a>and get one stop shopping that way.</p>
<p>In any event, my personal opinion is to never give anyone signature authority over your money in a way that they can directly access or withdraw it. If you have to use a financial advisor, make sure they are with a large firm so you have someone you can go after if fraud should happen.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s better to avoid financial advisors altogether if you can do things yourself. This is easy to do if you keep things simple. I know not all financial advisors are crooked, but it&#8217;s just an unfortunate circumstance that some are. Nobody cares more about your own money than you do.</p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2009/06/11/rule-8-strikes-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liars and Hedge Funds. Do I repeat myself?</title>
		<link>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2008/12/14/liars-and-hedge-funds-do-i-repeat-myself/</link>
		<comments>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2008/12/14/liars-and-hedge-funds-do-i-repeat-myself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>craigr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hedge funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ponzi scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crawlingroad.com/blog/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What can we learn from the recent $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_START--><p>The latest financial fiasco is a private hedge fund run by <a href="http://www.madoff.com/" target="_blank">Bernard L. </a><em><span style="font-style: normal;"><a href="http://www.madoff.com/" target="_blank">Madoff</a> that was found to be a giant <a title="Ponzi Schemes" href="http://www.sec.gov/answers/ponzi.htm" target="_blank">Ponzi Scheme.</a> The whole decades-long swindle bilked investors to the tune of </span><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong>$50 Billion</strong></span><span style="font-style: normal;"><strong> dollars.</strong> </span></em></p>
<p>Will new regulations prevent investment scams like this in the future? No. This stuff has been going on throughout human history. It&#8217;s obvious to most, but the fundamental problem with investing scams are they are run by liars. You can&#8217;t regulate liars. You can only diversify against and try to avoid being entangled by them. </p>
<p>Liars come in all forms and wealth levels. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enron_scandal" target="_blank">Enron</a> had perfectly fine books for years according to the regulators and auditors. It was just that their executives and accountants were lying about everything.  Then there&#8217;s the recent real-estate bubble. Many people who took out sub-prime mortgages lied about their income to buy a home they couldn&#8217;t afford. Mortgage brokers sold those loans to banks while lying about the credit quality. Investment banks then took pools of these mortgages and bundled them together and lied about the safety. Investors bought those mortgages thinking they were getting above market returns with little risk and lost a lot of money (they were lying to themselves). </p>
<p>Regulations can&#8217;t make liars honest. Ponzi schemes like this have been illegal since the dawn of modern securities regulations and they still happen. Liars are creative so you need to protect yourself against them.</p>
<p><span id="more-135"></span></p>
<p>So what should you take away from this incident? Several things:</p>
<p><strong>1) Diversify your money across multiple asset classes and financial institutions.</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Even the most well-established company, bank, money manager, brokerage or mutual fund company can run into problems some day that could threaten your investments. Also, some investment asset classes may run hot for years and then suddenly crash with tremendous losses. You don&#8217;t want to have your money so concentrated that you could lose it all if something unexpected happens. </p>
<p><strong>2) If something is too good to be true, it probably is. </strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It&#8217;s amazing how much money this simple rule could have saved people through the ages. </p>
<p><strong>3) You can&#8217;t cheat an honest man. </strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Many cons rely on the dishonesty of the victim as part of the act. Promises of easy profits by using dubious, gray area, or outright illegal methods are always warnings to stay away. </p>
<p><strong>4) If you don&#8217;t understand how an investment works, you should avoid it.</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">If an investment is complicated with many layers and moving parts it may have unknown risks. Same for investments where it is unclear exactly how the returns are being generated. If you don&#8217;t understand 100% what you&#8217;re investing in, then don&#8217;t invest. </p>
<p>If someone is offering an investment and is promising they can beat the market consistently with little risk you should <strong>run away</strong>. You worked years to save your money and you simply can&#8217;t risk losing it following the primrose path of easy wealth. <strong>Nobody has a shortcut to wealth, but there are many shortcuts to poverty. </strong></p>
<!--Amazon_CLS_IM_END-->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://crawlingroad.com/blog/2008/12/14/liars-and-hedge-funds-do-i-repeat-myself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
