Posts tagged risk control
Book Review – Books on Risk (and two podcasts)
Jan 28th
A theme you’ll hear on this blog about investing is the idea that the markets are not predictable. You may believe that I’m referring to the idea that you can’t predict returns on investments ahead of time and that’s partially true. The other part though relates to extreme risks that sweep through the markets in unpredictable ways with unpredictable results.
Aside from standard market risks, when you look at your investments it’s also important to always ask yourself: “What if I’m wrong?” Because, odds are, you will be wrong eventually. It’s just a question of degrees on how wrong it will be: A little or a lot.
The Permanent Portfolio has protection against unpredictable market risks and being wrong. If you’re wrong, you’re not going to be wrong so much that you take a crushing blow to your portfolio (because your asset allocation is widely diversified in relatively small chunks). We should also understand though that all investments have risk. Without risk, you will not get rewards. So risk must be taken to grow a portfolio, but it must be done with specific goals in mind. We need profits, but we also need defenses against an unknown future.
In this light, I’d like to share with you some books and podcasts that I think really hit at this problem of risk, uncertain futures and protecting yourself against being wrong. They may help you understand why diversifying and eliminating unnecessary risks in your portfolio is so important and why being wrong does not have to be fatal if you handle it correctly.
First there is John Allen Paulos and his book A Mathematician Plays The Stock Market. This 2003 title is one of a series of excellent books written about his worldly observations as a mathematician. In this case, the book details his own personal story of losing money in the stock market and how uncertainty rules. It’s an interesting look at many concepts you see in the investing world with respect to stocks vs. bonds, efficient market hypothesis, chaos theory, etc. And, best of all, it’s a very easy and fun read with almost no math but high level explanations of many concepts with real-world examples. He has a number of books written in his “A Mathematician” series exploring everything from innumeracy in society to his experiences investing (and losing) lots of money in Worldcom as he discusses in this book. The bottom line is that risk is real, markets are random, and trying to beat it can be very costly. His dedication reads:
To my father, who never played the market and knew little about probability, yet understood one of the prime lessons of both. “Uncertainty,” he would say, “is the only certainty there is, and knowing how to live with insecurity is the only security.”
John Allen Paulos – A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market Dedication
Now that’s a dedication I can get behind! That is the core philosophy of how the Permanent Portfolio is designed to operate.
Next, there is Nassim Nicholas Taleb and his series of books on chance. First there was Fooled By Randomness followed by The Black Swan. Both of these books explore the idea of unpredictability in the world. While his advice is largely being linked to finance today (he was a former trader), his observations come into play in many areas of life. His book, The Black Swan, pre-dated the 2008 crash involving Fannie Mae but said this in one of his footnotes:…the government-sponsored institution Fannie Mae, when I look at their risks, seems to be sitting on a barrel of dynamite, vulnerable to the slightest hiccup. But not to worry: their large staff of scientists deemed these events “unlikely.”
Nassim Taleb – The Black Swan Pg. 225
I’d say he certainly called that one correctly.
I also think you’ll enjoy these two podcasts from Nassim Taleb. One recorded in 2007 talks about his book The Black Swan. The second was recorded in 2009 after the market meltdown as an after-action report on what he had written and said before:
Taleb on Black Swans – April 30, 2007
Taleb on the Financial Crisis – March 23, 2009
One thing about Taleb is while he has disdain for most fields of economics (and especially the very silly Keynesians), he does have an affinity for the Austrian Economic School and their dislike of the over-application of mathematics in economics for what is, essentially, a human behavioral problem (aka. scientism). Why does this matter? For one, you cannot model risks accurately with standard statistical methods because human behavior is not predictable. Secondly, Harry Browne was a firm believer in Austrian Economics and the Permanent Portfolio design, at its absolute core, is based on the Austrian School’s theory on monetary cycles (a lengthy topic for another day) and embracing unpredictability in the world. In fact, I think that one of the reasons the Permanent Portfolio is good at dealing with market risk is because the Austrian Economics school is right about a great many things. This outlook helps to drive the portfolio down the right path over time avoiding serious pitfalls and dangerous assumptions about the future.
With these three books and two podcasts you will understand more about market risk than most professional investors and economists. Seriously. Combine that with Harry Browne’s podcasts, and his own previous books, and you’ll be well versed in the dangers of the unpredictable in the investing world and how to position yourself to deal with them.
Stock and Bond Only Portfolios: A Flawed Approach
Dec 20th
To me, the idea of a portfolio that only holds stocks and bonds is flawed. It has too much risk of loss and too much risk of hitting a pocket of dead air where it effectively doesn’t grow for many years. If I see something is a flawed design I want to fix or get rid of it. I don’t keep using a flawed design hoping that it doesn’t break again when experience has shown, clearly, that it will with the same bad results.
Many stock and bond portfolio strategies have risks that showed up in the past and caused large losses to investors and took years to recover. These approaches encourage people to take on too much risk in stocks and don’t have strong mechanisms to roll with unpredictable economic climates. These designs have experienced severe losses that panicked investors to bail out at the worst possible time (usually at the market bottom). Or they have failed to grow money at a meaningful after-inflation rate for long periods (The 1970s and now the 2000s for example). Sometimes it’s a combination of both. Of course there were good periods when the stock market was rolling ahead and 15% a year returns just seemed so boring after a while. But the inconsistency in the stock/bond only portfolio makes the entire plan seem like a game of chance rather than a winnable long term strategy. More >
Direct Bond Ownership vs. Bond Funds
Dec 16th
A reader asked about why it’s recommended investors own their Long Term Treasury Bonds directly for the Permanent Portfolio allocation vs. using a mutual fund.
Two words: Manager Risk
This is the idea that the people managing your investments can make decisions that hurt performance out of bad luck or recklessness. Remember: Nobody cares more about your money than you do.
The bond allocation for the Permanent Portfolio says that 25% of your money should be in US Treasury Long Term Bonds. These bonds offer low credit risk as the US Government can always tax people to pay creditors or (worst case) print money to cover the payments. That makes them the safest type of bond US investors can own. They are much safer than corporate bonds and municipal bonds.
This matters because you can buy and hold Treasury Bonds directly and not have to worry about the risks other bonds pose. When you own Treasury Bonds directly your money is under your control and you know exactly how it is being used. Further, you save money as you aren’t paying a fund manager a fee to own such low risk bonds for you.
Now, let’s consider bond funds vs. owning bonds directly. Fund managers often have leeway in how money is deployed if you read the fund’s prospectus. This is important for something like the Permanent Portfolio whose strategy relies on the investor to hold US Treasury Long Term Bonds with no credit risk at all times. You don’t want managers in your bond fund moving things around based on what they think the market will do. This can blow the protection of your bond allocation to pieces if they make a wrong call. You also don’t want them swapping out your ultra-safe Treasury Bonds with less safe securities in an attempt to boost returns. This can also get you into big trouble as we’ll explore below.
Too much gold hype…
Nov 10th
If you want some no-nonsense ways to own Gold you can read my FAQ:
People are wondering about the gold price. Is it going to go higher? Is it going to go lower? Etc. Well the unexciting answer is nobody knows. That’s right, nobody at all knows. I don’t care how pretty their charts are or what logical arguments they have for or against. What I do know is that too many people are talking about the stuff.
If you own gold as part of your Permanent Portfolio allocation then you should stick to your plan and rebalance when it is needed. However, I would not go out and buy gold for my speculative Variable Portfolio bets right now.
I don’t think any particular asset class looks like a great buy for a Variable Portfolio speculation. So personally I’d just stick to the four way Permanent Portfolio split and not do much gambling with my money.
Now if you own gold in your Permanent Portfolio again I’d say to stick to the plan. That means you have a rebalancing band of either a low of 15% and high of 35% or a low of 20% and high of 30%, etc. If you are at or above your band then you should sell down your gold and rebalance the proceeds into your lagging assets.
Yes, I know it’s hard when you read all the doom and gloom but you have to do it. The point is you take an asset everyone wants and sell it to buy something that less people want.
The Permanent Portfolio is designed to limit risks and perform contrary buys and sells in the market. At any one time you probably are going to have an asset doing very poorly and another doing very well. This is how it is designed to work. But you need to be sure you do your part. That means selling down assets when they are doing great and using the money to buy the things people don’t want to touch at the time.
You hear that term “Bubble” being overused a lot now? “Gold Bubble”, “Stock Bubble”, “Bond Bubble”, “Bubble Bubble”. Well the way you limit losses due to “bubbles” is by rebalancing. No elaborate market timing is needed. If you own too much, you sell it down until you own less of it and buy something else. Simple stuff.
Are you nervous about the rise in gold prices and all the hype? Well I know some people are because I’ve heard about it. Here’s my advice:
If you have a rebalancing band that is 35% and your gold has risen to, for example, 33% of your allocation then perhaps you can sell it down early to 25% and re-deploy the money. I don’t think selling early in your rebalancing bands is going to hurt you much if it makes you sleep better at night. Perhaps in the future you make your rebalancing bands the 20%/30% thresholds so you keep a tighter control over how much money you have at risk in each asset. This can incur added tax and brokerage fees you need to be aware of, but it’s not terrible if it makes you feel comfortable. Remember, this isn’t a science so there are no precise answers to be had.
The one thing I would not do though is let any allocation slice rise above 35%. If you sell out too early and harvest those profits you will be OK. Sure you’ve not milked out the very top of something. But, as they say, only liars sell out at the very top and buy at the very bottom. But if you wait and let an allocation go to 40%, 45%, 50%, etc. you can set yourself up to take a tremendous loss if the markets turn suddenly. This isn’t just a warning for gold, it’s a warning for any asset class you hold.
This is just a reminder to not make gold a religion and use it intelligently in a portfolio. I don’t know what the gold price is going to do, but I don’t think you should listen to all the hype in the news about it either. Stick to your plan and don’t take risks with money you can’t afford to lose.
Porn and the Permanent Portfolio
Oct 29th
You can learn things from the most unlikely sources. When people ask me what it was that got me to start following the Permanent Portfolio I respond with one word: Porn.
Yes, porn. I relate to you the story below that kicked me into gear to re-assess my portfolio strategy and risks I was taking several years ago. This is what got me to discover and start using the Permanent Portfolio allocation strategy.
I was buying some used welding gear off of Craigslist in late 2006(??) and go to this guy’s shop to look at what he had. We strike up a conversation and he tells me that he produces Adult Films but was getting out of the business (his shop had lots of light rigging and camera gear so I had no reason to doubt him). “Why are you doing that?” I ask. Because you’d think that making adult films is probably quite lucrative. I don’t know this, just a suspicion. He replies “I’m going into Real Estate!” He then spends the next 30 minutes telling me about flipping houses, second mortgages, zero down loans, etc. I just sit there and nod my head, buy the stuff he had for sale, and leave.
This bugged me because everyone was talking about Real Estate then and now I meet a porn producer going into it? It was just too much. On the way home I call my wife and say: “Honey, we’re going to sell everything we own relating to real estate. REITs, mortgage bonds, anything holding mortgages, etc. I’m then going to re-evaluate our portfolio from the ground up.”
I’m not a market timer, but that’s what I did. I call it a “Shoe Shine Boy” moment. A phrase I use that relates to a story where a famous investor (Joe Kennedy I’ve been told) was getting his shoes shined in 1929 and the shine boy kept giving him hot stock tips. He immediately went back to his office and sold all his stocks to avoid the big crash later that year. He figured that when the shine boy is giving you stock advice it’s time to get the heck out.
I sold everything that had real estate in it. I also sold all bond funds that had any type of credit risk. I had been an indexer for some years at that point so I knew I wanted an indexing strategy as active stock management just doesn’t work. Yet, I never felt comfortable with the claims of many about how you could own a bunch of stock index funds and take credit risk with bonds and have diversification. It was time I looked into the matter myself without any prejudices.
I looked at all the options and researched everything with a fresh take towards risk and uncertainty. Nothing was off the table no matter how it conflicted with what I’ve read before. Eventually, I ended up with the Permanent Portfolio after loads of research and scrutinizing of the approach.
The biggest thing about this experience is not that it helped me avoid a bad loss (which really was just shear luck). It’s that it made me seriously explore what risks I was taking with my portfolio and how those risks were being counter-balanced with other assets I own. You can’t invest without risk. But it’s important to be sure you know what risks you are taking and how they can affect your life savings if they ever show up. It took a porn producer to get me to go back and evaluate these things. Life is strange.
Black Monday Anniversary
Oct 26th
A poster on the Diehards forum remarks that today is the 80th Anniversary of Black Monday 1929 – The Great Stock Crash that touched off the Great Depression. In this very interesting video you can hear first hand accounts of the events that led up to the crash:
A New Swiss Gold ETF
Oct 7th
Blog reader Kyle sent me some information on a new gold ETF trading under the symbol SGOL. This ETF is a gold bullion ETF similar to the Street Tracks and iShares gold ETFS (Ticker: GLD and Ticker: IAU).
What makes this ETF different is SGOL’s gold is stored in Swiss bank vaults and not US financial centers. Since part of the Permanent Portfolio concept is to have some assets geographically diversified this could be an advantage. The expense ratio of this ETF is also very competitive as well at 0.39% which is right in line with the other offerings.
Now, some worry about a remote risk of US gold confiscation happening again in the future and this ETF would probably not prevent that (the govt. could simply pass an order requiring repatriation of funds for instance which would accomplish the same thing). However, this does give you a place for your assets that may not be open to the same type of risks as gold stored in the US. Risks such as from terrorist attacks, natural disasters, cyber attack, civil unrest, etc.
On the other hand, I’m not sure how if your US-based brokerage is having problems due to these issues here that it wouldn’t impact your ability to prove ownership in SGOL. Well, it’s a start at least.
This fund is brand new and I’m not one to jump into new financial products so I may give it time to build up some momentum. However, it’s something to consider for those that want to build a Permanent Portfolio and use ETFs for the gold portion but would like to have a modicum of geographic diversification.
Thanks again to Kyle for the tip.