Investing, economics, finance and random thoughts.
Posts tagged SHTF
FerFal Responds About Gold and Real Estate
Jan 21st
The previous book review of The Modern Survival Manual: Surviving the Economic Collapse covered the insider’s view of the Argentina financial crisis of 2001 and what happens when a society sees their currency lose more than 2/3rds of its value in a short period. It was an interesting read with unique insights into economics and sociology that you just won’t find in a standard textbook on the subject.
Now, I’m impartial to investment assets and don’t believe in extremes. I had some questions along the lines of going to extremes in investments and wrote to FerFal (Fernando – author of the book above) about his views having lived in a time when extremes did happen in his country. He gives his thoughts below.
On extremes in investing in gold (100% gold vs. not owning any gold) and real estate:
Extremes are bad, and I know what you mean. There’s people that believe anything other than gold is worthless and others that state “When the world ends I’ll trade an egg for a bar of gold!” You can only roll your eyes and think ok buddy, you sit there waiting for doomsday while I live in the real world.
I’ve noticed that both my father and grandmother have one thing in common. Grandma was a farmer in Spain, when she came to Argentina she started a successful bakery shop, lost their savings several times for many reasons, inflation, change of currencies, takeovers, etc.
My father is an accountant, he worked in banks most of his life, was on the board of directors of bank Boston in Boston, Massachusetts, practically lost the money he had to put into his retirement fund in Argentina.
The thing they both have in common? After a number of economic changes, inflation and corralitos of various kinds, the only thing both of them have left were their real estate investments. Those survived better than money in the bank, and unlike the almost useless retirement plans, the rent will be what really allows them to retire and live well.
Thought it was worth mentioning. I consider real estate an important part of one’s portfolio as well.
FerFal brings up a point that I hope to explore more in the future. I believe strongly that investors should have what a poster at the Bogleheads forum “chicagobear” aptly called a “have money” and a “make money” side of their portfolio.
Inside the Permanent Portfolio you have four assets: Stocks, Bonds, Cash and Gold. Stocks and bonds are your “make money” portfolio as they pay interest, dividends and have capital appreciation. Cash and gold are more of your “have money” portfolio because they pay little in interest (such as cash) or have no interest or dividends like gold (but may have capital appreciation). However these “have money” assets have tremendous ability to ride out very bad markets when your “make money” assets are doing poorly. The “make money” and “have money” halves of the portfolio work together to lower volatility and provide good returns.
But FerFal brings up another interesting asset: Real estate. It combines the aspects of “make money” by giving you an income stream from rent but also is a “have money” as it is an asset that can’t be inflated away easily.
For the Permanent Portfolio, Harry Browne cautioned against using real estate as an investment as he considered it speculative in nature. In many respects this is true. However if you own rental property you do have potential to make money if you choose a good location, have good renters, can manage maintenance costs, have a good management company, etc. This is the speculative risk part. It could work out, but there is risk that one or more things could happen to make it not profitable.
What about Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)? You get the high income streams from owning real estate, but don’t get the calls at 3AM in the morning about a leaking roof. REIT index funds own a wide variety of companies that have exposure to malls, office buildings, public storage companies, etc. So you get geographic and industry diversification as well. However, by owning stock you don’t own the actual property itself which may defeat the purpose of real estate entirely as a hard asset like gold. Yet, for investors that want to have some real estate exposure, but don’t want the hassle, it may be an acceptable trade off.
As it is, in terms of “make money” and “have money” side of things, real estate seems to straddle the fence. It combines elements of stocks and gold investing (along with both of their risks). It is a hybrid asset. If owned directly it can provide inflation insurance that stocks and bonds may not. Yet it can also provide an income stream that gold and cash cannot. With REITs you give up the direct ownership, but they do provide a nice income stream which is hard to ignore.
Are there risks? Of course. There are risks involved just as you’d suspect and they need to be managed effectively. For instance, property management seems like one of the biggest headaches for real estate investors (but not for REIT owners). In Argentina FerFal handles it this way:
About managing real estate, I’ve found that in most cases its better to spend a couple bucks each month and let a real estate agency collect the rent and argue with the people you rent to.
In few cases, you find the right person and things run smoothly, most often it doesn’t and a middle man like the real estate agency collecting rent and making the calls if they get behind saves you time and lots of headaches. Besides, they [the renters] pay better ( pay when they are supposed to) when they dont have the actual owner in front of them to cry to.
Never heard of owning real estate through stocks [REITs]. Here, most people manage their own property, with a real estate office always taking care of the contract ( very important to have a good contract) and some have real estate managers like the ones I mentioned.
Here its important to be good at haggling like I say in the book. I’ve had very serious, suit wearing real estate agents cut down their managing asking fees down to 10% of what they where originally asking for. It’s important to know the market, know what a realistic asking fee is.I’m a nice guy and dont like pushing people ( people that come up with excuses for not paying rent) but like everything else, you learn little by little, know when someone really just needs a couple more days, or when he’s playing with you. Again, best thing is to have someone else take care of it, specially if you’re not planning on having much time to chase people around to get paid.
Here in the states many rental property owners do use management companies and this does seem to lessen the stress. They manage the renters, the maintenance, etc. There are some potential pitfalls to navigate though (such as the management company overcharging you for services and maintenance, carrying insurance, etc.). So rental property ownership is far from a sure thing and will take some work on your part to choose wisely.
However if you think you have the stomach for it, rental properties may be a consideration if you’re looking to have exposure to hard assets but also want that asset to deliver an income stream. BTW. I don’t think time shares fall into this category. I think time shares are the kind of investment made to be sold, not bought. Also, when we’re talking about owning real estate I feel we’re talking about property where you own the note yourself and not taking out loans to buy properties and risk you can’t make the payments. Taking out large loans to buy property other than your own home is a violation of Rule #7 of the 16 Golden Rules of Financial Safety.
If you don’t want to deal with any of these risks, or don’t have funds to buy additional real estate outside of your home, it may make more sense to look into a REIT fund like Vanguard’s REIT index (Ticker: VGSIX) or the iShares Realty Majors Index (Ticker: ICF). If you are eligible, the TIAA-CREF Real Estate Fund has an excellent reputation as well. These options provide inexpensive exposure to real estate with the trade off being you don’t own the property itself. If you are comfortable with that, the REIT funds above provide an easy way to get real estate exposure. They also have the other advantage that they are very liquid. Meaning that you can sell them in 60 seconds to get your funds instead of waiting days, weeks, months or even years to unload a physical property plus realtor commissions.
In terms of asset allocation, real estate is in the variable portfolio side of the house. Basically, only do it with money you can afford to lose. Also realize that if you own a broadly based stock index fund like the Total Stock Market you already own REITs. You just don’t own a lot of them in proportion to everything else.
Also remember that real estate does have risk just as all investments do. It’s just a question of diversifying these risks against all your other assets to reduce losses if they should show up. REIT funds dropped over 65% from their 2007 highs to their lows in 2008 as a recent example. And despite what realtors always claim about physical property prices, many areas experienced significant price drops in real estate that could take years, or decades, to recover. Yet, with the real estate bubble clearly popped in the US this asset could be a reasonable buy for someone looking to diversify a little of their play money and have some protection against unexpected events as well.
Thank you Fernando for answering my questions. Please be sure to visit his blog where he provides information on many topics.
Book Review – The Modern Survival Manual: Surviving the Economic Collapse
Jan 15th
Formerly, I was in the Internet security field and part of my work was as a security auditor hired to break into computer networks as well as doing network attack tool development. So, it comes naturally to me to look for ways in which something may not go according to plan and deliberately push further until it breaks in unexpected ways. That’s what security auditing is at its core.
Therefore, as my research in investing and economics widened, I thought it would be an interesting exercise to depart from looking at optimistic scenarios and instead look at financial disasters. I already saw all the unrealistic hockey stick charts where people project their 15% annual returns for the next 50 years and retire by buying a Carribean island somewhere. Instead, I wanted to see how things worked when the train really sailed off the tracks. What assets held up, what didn’t, how long did it take to recover, etc. And, as it turned out, one of the more recent financial disasters was Argentina in 2001. During that year, the Peso was devalued from 1:1 with the US Dollar to a market exchange rate peaking around 4:1 Pesos for US dollars (that’s around an 80% loss of value kiddies). In the end, the overall damage to Argentina’s citizens was to lose more than 2/3rds of their wealth almost overnight as the government implemented extreme policies that made the situation worse.
Now it’s one thing to read about losing so much of one’s life savings under an extreme event like this, but it’s another thing to actually live through it. Yet, during my reading on the subject it just so happens that I came across a report from an Argentinian Architect student (now Architect Professor) living in Buenos Aires:
Lessons from Argentina’s Economic Collapse (Read all four parts at your leisure, it’s well worth your time)
He also published a book (and keeps a blog) that is a collection of his advice on what really happens when an industrialized country hits a very bad economic climate.
Unlike other survivalist-type books that operate under the idea that all you need is a bunker and some bullets, this book actually covers realistically what to expect. It details the events of 2001 and the aftermath. This includes the very high unemployment, crime and poverty (as high as 57% under the poverty line at one point). He also talks about what things you probably should have to prepare for this situation (hint: It does not include an armored personnel carrier, but does include things like LED headlamps and a moderate amount of food supplies to ride out some initial disruptions). Finally, he goes into great detail about what happens in a country when a currency really does hyper-inflate. For instance, did you know that vendors and banks will happily buy gold and silver but are not interested at all in bartering with ammunition? Do people really think you’re going to walk into a store and say:
[CraigR]: I know that pack of Coca Cola costs a half-dozen .308 caliber, but all I have are 10 rounds of .338 Lapua Magnum. Can you give me five 30-06 caliber softpoints for change? Oh, and I’ll take two gallons of napalm. I need to refill my flame thrower because I have a death match at the Thunderdome tonight.
Ignoring the fact for now that gold can diversify a portfolio without any financial disaster at all, one of the criticisms of gold is that for financial Armageddon some say you’re better off with bullets, razor blades, etc. However if you read accounts of what actually happened in developed countries like Argentina and Iceland it’s a total myth. In Surviving the Economic Collapse the author goes into detail about how and why barter systems must fail eventually and how they did exactly that in Argentina. As it turns out, gold and silver in fact are great assets to have once you move beyond the basic sustenance items for your family. People are always happy to exchange gold and silver for either real items or local currency. Moreover, there is not some magic button that’s pushed where everyone turns into rabid murdering lunatics roaming the countryside looking for the razor blade bazaar to trade their wares. In the book the author explains:
Survivalists spend countless hours discussing what product to stock specifically for post SHTF [craigr: Shit Hits The Fan] barter. Tools, needles, candles, shoes, and sometimes the most ridiculous suggestions are considered the wisest statement. This or that item, ‘will be worth its weight in gold’.
Well, no.
Only gold is always worth its weight in gold. Bar none.
- FerFal – Surviving the Economic Collapse
And on bartering with ammunition:
How about Uncle Bob’s ammo stash. He read somewhere that .22 Long Rifle would be the new currency after the SHTF, and the best barter item, so he bought a few 500 round packs.
Again, his surprise was big when the egg guy told him that he didn’t need .22 ammo, he doesn’t even like guns, he simply needs a plumber.
Since he was at the ‘Barter Club’ he checked around to see what was the actual market for his .22 stash, and was sort of disappointed by the few offers he got. Seemed that each person wanted a different item, and those that were interested…they looked like people from the wrong walk of life, and Bob wasn’t sure he wanted to give ‘them’ ammo. Ammo that would end up being used in delinquent’s guns and possibly against him and his family.
- FerFal – Surviving the Economic Collapse
Besides the above, he covers many other topics with an insightful outlook. Here’s a short list:
- Common myths about what happens during an economic crisis
- Why preparation is a good idea
- How to prepare
- Importance of being physically fit
- Crime and unemployment
- Risks of living in rural areas
- Risks of living in the city
- Security in your home
- Security in your vehicle
- Gear to keep on your person, car and at home
- What kind of gun to buy first for protection
- Self-defense skills – unarmed
- Self-defense skills – armed
- Finances under economic calamities
- Making money in bad economies
- Bartering
- Gold and other foreign currencies in a crisis
- How to expect your government to respond
- Bribing, looting, riots and relocating
- Having multiple plans in case things don’t work out where you are
Lastly, the author reflects a bit on what he’d do differently if he knew what was going to happen ahead of time. This involves what items he’d buy, what he’d avoid, how he’d diversify his money and other small but important details that you may not have considered.
Overall I really enjoyed this book for the practical details inside of a financial crisis and what really happens as opposed to theories. The author apologizes for the writing in the book as English is not his first language, but I found his writing style humorous and blunt with no sugar coating. From his descriptions and acknowledgements of what he did right and wrong you can tell that he’s someone with (unfortunate) experience in these matters.
For $24.95 I think this is a great buy. It’s a book that offers practical advice for anyone who wants to be better prepared in case any type of emergency should arise that affects where they live whether natural or man-made. I give this book five stars. It’s a great read.
