Investing, economics, finance and random thoughts.
Posts tagged simplicity
Safe. Stable. Simple.
Mar 18th
Safe. Stable. Simple. These are the words Harry Browne used to describe his investment philosophy in his October 10, 2004 radio show. He pretty much nails it.
October 10, 2004 Investing Radio Show
Safe
A portfolio that is safe is one that is invested conservatively but also with strong diversification in case things don’t go according to plan. People work hard for their life savings. Why gamble those savings on some get-rich-quick investing scheme that can cost a big chunk of it if things go wrong? A portfolio that is safe does not mean tucking the money under the mattress. What it means is that investors buy things only that they fully understand for a very specific reason. Risks are taken where they should be and avoided where they add nothing to the bottom line. A portfolio invested this way can hold assets that are “risky” but own them in a way where the risks wash out over the long run and produce actually safer and more consistent returns through diversification. Safety also means following some basic rules of investing that will make it much harder to fall into many common investment traps.
Stable
A portfolio that is stable allows an investor to not panic when the markets are in serious turmoil. Stability doesn’t mean investors won’t ever take a loss. What it means is that the losses will be dampened so that the pain is tolerable and not driving the investor to waking up in a cold sweat. These situations, if they occur, can cause investors to make bad decisions about their money usually at the worst possible time. Stability in a portfolio means that investors can focus on their work and savings which is really driving most portfolio returns (especially early on).
A portfolio that is stable also means it is giving out reasonable market returns. A consistent return over the years can grow a portfolio greatly due to compounding. There is no need to reach for the brass ring for double-digit growth because that always means higher risks. Higher risks means less stability and a potential for doing much worse in the markets than what an investor is expecting. On the other hand, a more consistent growth can prove incredibly powerful if just left alone and a stable portfolio means investors will leave it alone. Since long term investment success is related to the ability to stay the course and not try to time the markets, stability in the portfolio is an important ingredient because it helps keep emotions in check no matter what the markets are doing.
Simple
I love simplicity, especially for investing. Complicated investing strategies and products can conceal many risky moving parts underneath. Many times these risks will not be discovered until it’s too late. Not just this, but often financial advisors will sell complicated strategies because it makes sure you keep them around to manage it all for a hefty fee. Investing does not need to be, nor should it be, complicated. There is a strong relationship between complicated investment approaches, lower performance and higher risks – All things you don’t want. Portfolios that are simple have lower management fees, lower taxes, lower chances of hidden risks, and can be managed without the use of a financial advisor with very little time commitment on the part of the investor. All of these attributes ensure a greater chance of long-term investment success.
There you have it. Safe. Stable. Simple. The three words that define the Permanent Portfolio. If you’ve never heard this radio show, you’ll enjoy it. Harry Browne discusses these and other important topics that are the foundation for growing and protecting wealth.
Complicated costs. Simple saves.
Feb 12th
I was going through some old investing books today getting ready to dispose of them to make room on my shelves. When paging through the candidates for removal, I saw so many complicated investing strategies. Some of the portfolio recommendations held 10 or more different mutual funds as part of their allocations! I bought these books early in my investment career and during that time they convinced me that only a complicated investment strategy could deliver diversification and performance.
Boy, was I wrong.
After looking back over the many years when I first bought these books it showed me this: Despite the complexity of these various strategies, not a single one of them added anything significant to investor diversification over this time. Owning a bunch of stock funds does not make you diversified. If anything, these approaches were tremendously risky for what you got out of them. Yet, the approaches hid those risks by making you think you had diversification because you owned so many different stock assets.
Well, stocks share the same market risks by and large because of the deep interconnections that exist between them all. Just because an investor owns some small company stocks, large company stocks, foreign stocks, etc. is no guarantee that a bad bear market can’t come up and bite them all at once. I didn’t go back and run the performance numbers, but my quick look predicts that over the period I owned the books they wouldn’t have done any better than a simpler portfolio. With the additional trading and management costs involved, there is a chance they did worse than a simpler approach.
This just reminded me how important it is to keep investing simple. Complicated investment schemes can hide many risks and expenses. The simpler you keep investing, the less chance you have of making a mistake. Investors don’t need to follow complicated investment plans to get good results. Indeed, I’ve found the simpler you keep investing the more likely you are to turn a good profit and not face any wicked surprises.