Posts tagged variable portfolio
Index Funds and IPOs
A poster on the forum brought up a great question on whether index funds would be forced to buy the upcoming Facebook IPO. The worry is that the index funds will load up on the IPO and take a loss later as the IPO price comes back down to Earth.
No, this isn’t likely to happen.
IPOs are, for the uninitiated, one of the worst investments to buy. The company and investment bankers hold all the cards. They set the date for the offering, set the price, set the shares to be issued, grease the skids with brokers by allowing some early access (which they’ll dump after the price goes up), etc. Never buy IPOs no matter how tempting the media hype says they are.
So why won’t the index funds go out and load up on a big IPO like Facebook? Well, they have entry requirements for the most part. The S&P index formulation requires IPOs not only be listed for a certain period of time (6-12 months), but also have a certain number of profitable quarters before they would be added. These guys weren’t born yesterday!
From Standard and Poor’s Eligibility Requirements starting on Pg. 5
Specifically, these two points will keep most of the IPO hype at bay:
Financial Viability. Usually measured as four consecutive quarters of positive as- reported earnings. As-reported earnings are Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) net income excluding discontinued operations and extraordinary items. For REITs, financial viability is based on both as-reported earnings and Funds From Operations (FFO). FFO is a measure commonly used in REIT analysis.
Another measure of financial viability is a company’s balance sheet leverage, which should be operationally justifiable in the context of both its industry peers and its business model.
Treatment of IPOs. Initial public offerings should be seasoned for 6 to 12 months before being considered for addition to an index.
The index funds are not going to load up on Facebook when they go public (or they shouldn’t!). This is actually another good reason to own index funds and not actively managed funds that do not have these screening rules before buying stocks. Index funds still remain the single best way to own exposure to the stock market.
Now, if you really want to own a new IPO company for your variable portfolio (for money you can afford to lose), then let it just simmer for about six months and then buy into it. By then the price normally will have settled (usually lower) and you’ll have a better chance of making a profit.
EDIT: The Finance Buff asked about other indices like Russell 3000 and Wilshire 5000. These indices are more lax than S&P and will reformulate and bring in IPOs sooner. However they still have a lag time and it is not likely they will be going out and immediately bring in Facebook IPO based on their formulation criteria which I list below:
Russell Index Formulation and Methodology
Russell lists out the specifics on how IPOs are added beginning on Pg. 8.
Wilshire has their methodology here. They will do monthly, but it doesn’t look like the Facebook IPO is going to be snapped up immediately either:
In the past when someone asked what Small Cap value fund to use of Russell 2000 vs. S&P 600 for instance I would steer them towards the S&P versions because of their more sane screening process to weed out IPOs. I think S&P’s handling of IPOs is a smarter way to do it vs. their competitors.
Variable Portfolio: Why REITs are Better Than Owning Real Estate Directly
Thinking of some real estate property for your variable portfolio? Run away! At least, that’s my opinion. I don’t have the personality for it. But, people ask sometimes what I recommend if they want to take the gamble. My advice? Buy a REIT index fund with a low expense ratio. Vanguard and iShares both offer them.
A while ago I made up my list of reasons why I like owning REIT index funds vs. actual property for speculative purposes:
1) Index funds don’t call you at 3AM complaining about the plumbing.
2) Index funds don’t sue you when they slip and fall on a broken sidewalk.
3) Index funds don’t trash your place after you try to evict them.
4) Index funds don’t use the court system to squat in your home after not paying rent.
5) Index funds don’t engage in criminal activity from your home.
6) Index funds don’t pick up and move out in the middle of the night stiffing you with large rent due and damages.
7) Index funds pay you dividends constantly without having to place ads looking for new tenants.
8 ) Index funds don’t get the cops called on them by the neighbors for causing problems.
9) Index funds don’t need criminal background checks.
10) Index funds don’t write bad checks.
11) Index funds don’t sell crack cocaine, trash your home, and leave behind a flea-infested druggie flophouse after the police kick in the door.
BTW. These things happened to people I know that had rental properties or were things I witnessed directly. Number 11 is no joke. I was working a job a long time ago that brought me there and I left the house covered in fleas.
Last, but not least, when you are tired of your real estate speculating you can sell the REIT index in about 10 seconds vs. having to dispose of physical property.
What about your home? Is that an investment? No way. It is a consumption item and should never be thought of as an investment. The idea that the home you live in is an investment is one of the great myths of the real estate industry. Don’t fall for it!
Japan Reactor News
There is a lot of hyperbole in the news about Japan’s damaged reactors. While we shouldn’t downplay the seriousness of the situation, we also should realize that much of what we’re reading may simply be blown out of proportion by the reporters. The MIT Nuclear Science and Engineering Department is running a blog that is tracking the situation in Japan. In addition to periodic updates on the reactor containment operations, they also explain many of the concepts behind the accident and what they really mean.
I recommend reading this site first before paying attention to mainstream news coverage about the incident:





